Developing simulation model of two-rank MANET Network


DOI: 10.34759/trd-2019-109-13

Аuthors

Volkov A. S.1*, Muratchaev S. S.1**, Kulpina Y. A.2***

1. National Research University of Electronic Technology, Bld. 1, Shokin Square, Zelenograd, Moscow, Russia, 124498
2. National Research University of Electronic Technology, 1, sq. Shokina, Moscow, Zelenograd, 124498, Russia

*e-mail: leshvol@mail.ru
**e-mail: said.muratchaev@gmail.com
***e-mail: kulpinaulia37@gmail.com

Abstract

Decentralized mobile MANET networks (Mobile Ad-hoc Network) are self-organizing radio networks with a topology without basic stations. The presented work is devoted to the study of MANET networks performance improvements. Mainly, the two-rank MANET network concept is considered. It supposed that single-rank MANET network conversion into the two-rank topology would improve the network operation in a part of such parameters as throughput and average latency. Many merits and demerits, the main from which was the small coverage zone and its impossibility of widening by technical means, were revealed while studying properties of this class of networks.

A simulation model of the proposed two-rank architecture of the MANET network was developed in the Network Simulator 3 simulation environment. Based on the simulation results, two graphs were plotted, namely, the dependence of the average latency value and the dependence of the batches delivery coefficient on the data transfer rate.

Modeling was performed in three stages. The first stage was the MANET ad-hoc network consisting of 350 nodes modeling. Based on the results, a graph of the network bandwidth dependence on simulation time was plotted. The values of average latency, throughput, a share of lost batches and average route setting time were obtained as well. The second stage was the MANET two-rank network simulation. Characteristics of the network interaction similar to those at the previous stage, and a graph of the throughput versus simulation time were obtained. The third stage consisted in both single-rank and two-rank MANET networks simulation with gradual data transfer data-transfer rate value changing. Two graphs were plotted by the results of the simulation. They are the dependencies of average latency and batches delivery coefficient on the data-transfer rate. The effectiveness of the proposed two-rank network topology allows achieving an average gain of 15-30% compared to the classical MANET networks representation in parameters of throughput and average network latency. Basing on the simulation model operation, inferences can be drawn on the communication quality improvement practicality by the two-rank topology implementation in the MANET network.

Keywords:

MANET, routing protocols, two-rank networks, ad hoc

References

  1. Mobile Ad hoc Networking (MANET): Are Not A Fundamentally Flawed Architecture, available at: https://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~rmartin/teaching/fall04/cs552/papers/012.pdf

  2. Tanenbaum E., Uezeroll D. Komp’yuternye seti (Computer networks), Saint Petersburg, Piter, 2012, 970 p.

  3. Opisanie raboty protokola AODV i ego realizatsiya v programme NS-3, available at: https://www.nsnam.org/docs/models/html/aodv.html

  4. A.K. Gupta, H. Sadawarti, A.K. Verma. Performance analysis of AODV, DSR & TORA Routing Protocols, IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, April 2010, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 226 – 231.

  5. Opisanie raboty protokola OLSR i ego realizatsiya v programme NS-3, available at: https://www.nsnam.org/docs/models/html/olsr.html

  6. Supriya Singla, Sushma Jain. Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols of MANET in Real World Scenario using NS3, International Journal of Computer Applications, 2014, no. 99 (14), pp. 17 – 23. DOI: 10.5120/17441-8223

  7. Opisanie struktury modeli v programme NS-3, available at: https://www.nsnam.org/docs/release/3.25/tutorial/singlehtml/index.html

  8. Borodin V.V., Petrakov A.M., Shevtsov V.A. Trudy MAI, 2015, no. 81, available at: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=57894

  9. Realizatsiya modeli MANET-seti v programme NS-3, available at: https://www.nsnam.org/doxygen/manet-routing-compare_8cc_source.html

  10. NS-3 Network Simulator. NS-3 Manual. Release ns-3-dev, 2017, 169 p, available at: https://www.nsnam.org/docs/manual/ns-3-manual.pdf

  11. Borodin V.V., Petrakov A.M., Shevtsov V.A. Elektrosvyaz’, 2016, no. 11, pp. 41 – 45.

  12. M. Fazeli, H. Vaziri. Assessment of Throughput Performance Under OPNET Modeler Simulation Tools in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs), 2011 Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks, Bali, 2011, pp. 328 – 331. DOI: 10.1109/CICSyN.2011.75

  13. Rahman M.U., Abbas S. Simulation-based analysis of MANET routing protocols using group mobility model, 2016 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), Coimbatore, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/INVENTIVE.2016.7823290

  14. Sainy S.K., Chaudhary R.R., Kumar A. Performance evaluation of routing protocols based on different models in MANET, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT), Bangalore, 2016, pp. 1666 – 1670. DOI:10.1109/RTEICT.2016.7808116

  15. K.C.K. Naik, C. Balaswamy, P.R. Reddy. Performance Analysis of OLSR Protocol for MANETs under Realistic Mobility Model, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT), Coimbatore, India, 2019, vol. 8, issue 2, available at: https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v8i2/B1938078219.pdf

  16. Rath M. Group based analysis of AODV related protocols in MANET, 2016 6th International Conference – Cloud System and Big Data Engineering (Confluence), Noida, 2016, pp. 548 – 553. DOI:10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2016.7508180

  17. Noor Alleema N, Sivakumar D. Study and analysis of opportunistic routing protocols in MANET, 2015 IEEE Technological Innovation in ICT for Agriculture and Rural Development (TIAR), Chennai, 2015, pp. 139 – 143. DOI: 10.1109/TIAR.2015.7358546

  18. N. Kumari, S.K. Gupta, R. Choudhary, S.L. Agrwal, New performance analysis of AODV, DSDV and OLSR routing protocol for MANET, 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, 2016, pp. 33 – 35.

  19. K.C.K. Naik, C. Balaswamy, P.R. Reddy. Performance Analysis of OLSR Protocol for MANETs under Realistic Mobility Model, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT), Coimbatore, India, 2019, pp. 1 – 5.

  20. Y. Chaba, Y. Singh, M. Joon. Simulation based performance analysis of on-demand routing protocols in MANETs, 2010 Second International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, Sanya, Hainan, 2010, pp. 80-83. DOI: 10.1109/ICCMS.2010.392


Download

mai.ru — informational site MAI

Copyright © 2000-2024 by MAI

 Вход