Functional characteristics assessment technique for radio-monitoring systems at restricted data on reliability parameters

DOI: 10.34759/trd-2019-108-16

Аuthors

Vasil'kov Y. V.^1*, Timoshenko A. V.^2**, Sovetov V. A.^3***, Kirmel A. S.^4****

1. Yaroslavl State Technical University, 88, Moscow Avenue, Yaroslavl, 150023, Russia
2. Radiotechnical Institute named after academician A.L. Mintz, 10-1, str. 8 March, Moscow, 127083, Russia
3. Higher Military School of Air Defense, 28, Moskovsky avenue, Yaroslavl, 150001, Russia
4. Scientific and Engineering Center of Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University, 5, str. Professor Popov, lit. O, Saint Petersburg, 197376, Russia

*e-mail: myvas@gapm.ru
**e-mail: atimoshenko@rti-mintsu
***e-mail: sovetov@list.ru
****e-mail: kirmell@mail.ru

Abstract

The article regard specifics of modelling and functional characteristics assessment of radio monitoring systems at restricted data on reliability parameters. It considers the issues of the systems mathematical models adequacy, including sundry approaches to the adequacy assessment. Approaches for earlier probability determination of hazardous event occurrence, which are based on trends extraction both in cases of noiseless assessments and in case of strongly noisy ones are presented. In the last case, the beginning, end and slope angle of the trends, which are employed while modelling radio-monitoring systems with random components, are extracted.

Specifics of failure flow intensity characteristics identification of the system elements while simulation organizing for analyzing failure flow intensity impact on the simulation results are considered, and recommendations are given for the cases, when the failure flow intensity is unknown in advance.

Specifics of mathematical simulation organization for the cases, when the failure flow intensity is unknown in advance, were considered, and analysis of the failure flow intensity effect on the simulation results was performed.

Keywords:

mathematical model, random variable, model adequacy, dangerous event, probability, failure rate

References

1. Vasil’kov Yu.V., Inyats N. Statisticheskie metody upravleniya predpriyatiem (Statistical methods of enterprise management), Moscow, RIA Standarty i kachestvo, 2008, 280 p.

2. Khimmel’blau D. Analiz protsessov statisticheskimi metodami (Analysis of processes with statistical methods), Moscow, Mir, 1973, 958 p.

3. Bendat Dzh., Pirsol A. Prikladnoi analiz sluchainykh dannykh (Applied analysis of random data), Moscow, Mir, 1989, 540 p.

4. Eckehard Bauer, MSc, Dr. Roland F. Erben, Mag. Peter Reichert. Risk Manager. Training course, Quality Austria, Trainings-, Zertifizierungs- und Begutachtungs GmbH, 2009, 110.

5. Vasil’kov Yu.V., Gushchina L.S. Materialy mezhdunarodnogo e-simpoziuma ES-E-2013-016 «Matematicheskie i instrumental’nye metody ekonomiki: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika», Kirov, MTsNIP, 2013, pp. 24 – 36.

6. Vasilkov Y., Gushchina L. Management of internal risks and opportunities of enterprises, International Journal for Quality Research, 2015, no. 9 (3), pp. 455 – 466.

7. Vasil’kov Yu.V. et al. Opredelenie trenda parametra potoka otkazov radioelektronnoi apparatury, Vestnik Yaroslavskogo vysshego voennogo uchilishcha protivovozdushnoi oborony, 2018, no. 2, pp. 82 – 95.

8. Lubkov N.V., Spiridonov I.B., Stepanyants A.S. Trudy MAI, 2016, no. 85, available at: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=67501

9. Linkevichius A.P. Trudy MAI, 2017, no. 94, available at: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=81098

10. Gipich G.N.et ai. Riski i bezopasnost’ aviatsionnykh system (Risks and safety of aviation systems), Moscow, GosNII GA, 2013, 225 p.

11. Maksimei I.V. Imitatsionnoe modelirovanie slozhnykh sistem. Matematicheskie osnovy (Simulation of complex systems. Part 1. Mathematical basics), Minsk, BGU, 2009, Ch. 1, 263 p.

12. Artin E. Vvedenie v teoriyu gamma-funktsii (Introduction to the theory of gamma functions), Moscow, URSS, 2009, 37 p.

13. Il’in V.A. et al. Matematicheskii analiz (Mathematical Analysis), Moscow, Izd-vo MGU, 1987, 358 p.

14. Zaporozhtsev A.V. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya, 2014, no. 8, Ch. 6, pp. 1288 – 1294.

15. Lapina V.L., Popova V.M., Puchkova V.A., Tomakova V.I., Faleeva M.I. Nadezhnost’ tekhnicheskikh sistem i tekhnogennyi risk (of Technical systems reliability and technological risk), Moscow, Delovoi ekspress, 2002, available at: https://www.docme.ru/doc/1699002/akimov-v.a.—lapin-v.l.-nadezhnost._-tehnicheskih-sistem-i-t

16. Hillson D. The Risk Management Handbook: A practical guide to managing the multiple dimensions of risk. Kogan Page, London, 2016, available at: https://play.google.com/store/books/details/The_Risk_Management_Handbook_A_Practical_Guide_to_?id=Qo...

17. Akimov V.A., Lapin V.L., Popov V.M., Puchkova V.A., Tomakova V.I., & Faleeva M.I. (2008). Probability of danger (Technical systems reliability and technological hazards). Electronic textbook. Retrievedfrom: http://www.obzh.ru/nad/7-1.html

18. Avakyan A.A., Kurganov A.V. Trudy MAI, 2013, no. 71, available at: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=47075

19. Basmanov V.G., Zakalata A.A., Kholmanskikh V.M. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya, 2015, no. 5-2, pp. 247 – 251.

20. Akimov E.V., Kuznetsov M.N. Trudy MAI, 2010, no. 40, available at: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=22873

Download