Studying torch parameters behind the atomizer with jet and swirled fuel feeding
DOI: 10.34759/trd-2020-113-03
Аuthors
*, **, ***Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev, 10, Karl Marks str., Kazan, 420111, Russia
*e-mail: andreybaklanov@bk.ru
**e-mail: dima-krasnov-09@mail.ru
***e-mail: almazsdf@mail.ru
Abstract
The discharges level of deleterious contaminants concentration in combustion products is one of the basic parameters, characterizing the combustion process effectiveness in combustion chambers.
The article being presented considers the impact of fuel feeding technique, realized in the atomizer, on the above said parameter variation. One of the considered atomizers ensures jet feeding of the fuel with the perforated atomizer, while the other one ensures swirled fuel feeding by the swirler integrated into the fuel passage. Basic geometrics of the atomizers, such as swirler sizes, the number of blades and the outlet nozzle diameter, are presented as well.
The flame tube simulator design, in which the tested atomizer is being placed, is regarded. The article presents the test bench installation designed for the atomizers testing in the flame tube simulator, as well as modes at which these tests were conducted. The results were obtained in the flame tube simulator with installed jet atomizers and atomizers with the swirled fuel jet. The analysis, by which results the inferences on the jet atomizers application efficiency were drawn, was performed. According to the performed studies, parameters of the atomizer with swirled fuel jet are being characterized by the presence of high values of CO and CH level in the combustion products, which is explained by the low mixing quality of fuel with air and, consequently, extremely low effectiveness of the fuel combustion. The atomizer with jet fuel feeding demonstrates low CO and CH values, which is indicative of the good quality of fuel mixing with air and high efficiency of combustion process organizing.
Keywords:
combustion chamber, gas turbine engine, atomizerReferences
-
Lieuwen T., McDonell V., Petersen E., Santavicca D. Fuel Flexibility Influences on Premixed Combustor Blowout, Flashback, Autoignition, and Stability, ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2008, vol. 130 (1), pp. 011506. DOI: 10.1115/1.2771243
-
Harrison W., Zabarnick S. The OSD Assured Fuels Initiative–Military Fuels Produced from Coal, DoE Clean Coal Conference, Clearwater, FL, June 2007.
-
Moses C., Roets P. Properties, Characteristics and Combustion Performance of Sasol Fully Synthetic Jet Fuel, ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2009, vol. 131, no. 4. DOI: 10.1115/1.3028234
-
Borisov A.D. Trudy MAI, 2016, no. 90. URL: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=74721
-
Markushin A.N., Baklanov A.V. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Aerokosmicheskaya tekhnika, tekhnologii i mashinostroenie, 2013, no. 3, pp. 131 - 138.
-
Markushin A.N., Baklanov A.V. Trudy MAI, 2018, no. 99. URL: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=91839
-
Markushin A.N., Merkushin V.K., Byshin V.M., Baklanov A.V. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Aviatsionnaya tekhnika, 2010, no. 1, pp. 41 - 44.
-
Kiesewetter F., Konle M., and Sattelmayer T. Analysis of Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown Driven Flashback in a Premix Burner with Cylindrical Mixing Zone, ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2007, vol. 129, pp. 929 – 936. DOI: 10.1115/1.2747259
-
Lieuwen T.C. and Yang V. Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, Reston, VA, 2005, vol. 210, 657 p.
-
Lefebvre A.H., Ballal D.R. Gas Turbine Combustion: Alternative Fuels and Emissions, CRC Press, 2010, 537 p.
-
Danil'chenko V.P., Lukachev S.V., Kovylov Yu.L. et al. Proektirovanie aviatsionnykh gazoturbinnykh dvigatelei (Design of aircraft gas turbine engines), Samara, Izd-vo SNTs RAN, 2008, 620 p.
-
Ashwani K. Gupta, D. G. Lilley, Nick Syred. Swirl Flows. Energy and engineering science series. Abacus Press, 1984, 475 p.
-
Mosolov S.V., Sidlerov D.A., Ponomarev A.A. Trudy MAI, 2012, no. 59. URL: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=34989
-
Durbin M.D., Vangsness M.D., Ballal D.R., Katta V.R. Study of Flame Stability in a Step Swirl Combustor, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1996, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 308 - 315. DOI: 10.1115/1.2816592
-
Lefebvre A.H. Fuel effects on gas turbine combustion-ignition, stability, and combustion efficiency, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1984, vol. 107, pp. 24 – 37. DOI: 10.1115/1.3239693
-
Gokulakrishnan P., Fuller C.C., Klassen M.S.,.Joklik R.G, Kochar Y.N., Vaden S.N., Seitzman J.M. Experiments and modeling of propane combustion with vitiation, Combustion and Flame, 2014, vol. 161, no. 8, pp. 2038 - 2053. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.01.024
-
Taylor S.C. Burning Velocity and the Influence of Flame Stretch, University of Leeds, 1991, 332 p.
-
Yi T., Gutmark E.J. Real-time prediction of incipient lean blowout in gas turbine combustors, AIAA Journal, 2007, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1734 – 1739. DOI: 10.2514/1.25847
-
Metechko L.B., Tikhonov A.I., Sorokin A.E., Novikov S.V. Trudy MAI, 2016, no. 85. URL: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=67495
-
Baklanov A.V., Neumoin S.P. A technique of gaseous fuel and air mixture quality identification behind the swirl burner of gas turbine engine combustion chamber, Russian Aeronautics, 2017, no. 60, pp. 90 – 96. DOI: 10.3103/S1068799817010135
Download