Improving the fuel efficiency of a transport aircraft by minimizing the weight of its non-planar lifting surface

Design, construction and manufacturing of flying vehicles


Gueraiche D. 1*, Popov S. A.2**

1. Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), 4, Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, А-80, GSP-3, 125993, Russia
2. ,



The article evaluates the effect of various design solutions, improving the wing lift-to-drag ratio of a medium-range transport aircraft, on its fuel efficiency. In particular, the most common on modern airliners design solution , which consists in employing a non-planar lifting surface in the form of the classical wing-winglet combination, has been studied in details. A designing calculation technique has been developed for determining the magnitude of aerodynamic loading for various non-planar wing configurations, with account for increments of the local angles of attack and sideslip. These local angles change simultaneously with the general angle of attack changes, resulting in a non-uniform growth of the aerodynamic force coefficient along the wing-winglet span. Geometrical analysis allowed the representing the local lift coefficient as a function of the general angle of attack of the aircraft. The integral of this spanwise lift distribution function along the wing-winglet span allowed calculate of the total aerodynamic loading. The obtained local lift distribution function along a non-planar lifting surface has been applied to estimate the changes in total aerodynamic loading of an aeroelastic wing, the non-planar upward flexed shape of which can be easily parametrized through a second order function.

Weight-equivalents comparison of different configurations allowed perform a quantitative analysis of the increase in the aircraft fuel efficiency, resulted from the increase of the lift-to-drag ratio, aerodynamic loading redistribution along the wing-span and corresponding changes of the wing structural weight. The internal structural layout of the wing was chosen arbitrarily, so the structural weight growth was determined as a function of the structural material density, given the hypothesis that sustaining the initial margin of safety without changing the wing structure can be achieved solely by choosing a material with a higher ultimate strength, and as a result a higher density.


non-planar wing of a transport aircraft, winglets, take-off weight gradients, multidisciplinary optimization, aeroelastic wing


  1. Gueraiche D, Popov S. Winglet Geometry Impact on DLR-F4 Aerodynamics and an Analysis of a Hyperbolic Winglet Concept // Aerospace, 2017, 4(4), 60, available at:

  2. Gueresh D. XLIII Mezhdunarodnaya molodezhnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya “Gagarinskie Chteniya – 2017”. Tezisy dokladov, Moscow, 05-19 April 2017, pp. 11 – 12.

  3. Gueresh D. Mezhdunarodnaya Aviatsionno-Kosmicheskaya Konferentsiya i Vystavka. OAE “ICEAAE-2018”. Tezisy dokladov. 26-27 Febryary 2018, Abu-Dabi, OAE, available at:

  4. Koshcheev A.B., Platonov A.A., Khabrov A.V. Aerodinamika samoletov semeistva Tu-204/214 (Aerodynamics of Тu-204/214 family of aircraft), Moscow, Poligon-Press, 2009, 304 p.

  5. Norton D.A., Olason M.L. Aerodynamic design philosophy of the Boeing 737, Journal of Aircraft, 1966, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 524 – 528, available at:

  6. Christopher Gedeon, Shane Huffer, and Timothy T. Takahashi. Multi-Disciplinary Design of an Advanced Narrow-Body Transport Aircraft, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2013-4329), August 12-14, 2013, Los Angeles, available at:

  7. Krutov A.A., Pigusov E.A., Chernavskikh Yu.N., Chernousov V.I. Trudy MAI, 2018, no. 99, available at:

  8. Arutyunov A.G., Dydyshko D.V., Endogur A.I., Kuznetsov K.V., Tolmachev V.I. Trudy MAI, 2016, no. 90, available at:

  9. Efremov A.V., Zakharchenko V.F., Ovcharenko V.N. Dinamika poleta (Flight dynamics), Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 2011, 775 p.

  10. Anderson J.D. Introduction to Flight, McGraw-Hill, New York, Fourth Edition, 2012, 925 p.

  11. Eger S.M. Proektirovanie samoletov (Aircraft design), Moscow, Logos, 2005, 612 p.

  12. Endogur A.I. Konstruktsiya samoletov. Konstruirovanie detalei i uzlov (Aircraft structure design. Design of parts and assemblies), Moscow, Izd-vo MAI, 2013, 546 p.

  13. Voit E.S., Endogur A.I. Proektirovanie konstruktsii samoletov (Aircraft structures designing), Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1987, 407 p.

  14. Krasnov N.F. Aerodinamika. Osnovy teorii. Aerodinamika profilya i kryla. Chast’ 1 (Aerodynamics. Fundamentals. Airfoil and wing aerodynamics. Part 1.), Moscow, URSS, 2009, 496 p.

  15. Anderson J.D. Fundamentals of aerodynamics. McGraw-Hill Series in Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering, New York, 2011, 1106 p.

  16. Gueresh D., Popov S.A. Nauchnyi vestnik MGTU GA, 2018, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 124 – 136.

  17. Redeker G. DLR-F4 Wing Body Configuration/A Selection of Experimental Test Cases for the Validation of CFD Codes. In AGARD-AR-303. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France, 1994, vol. II, pp. 1 – 24.

  18. McDonald M.A. AGARD-AR-303. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France, 1994, vol. 1B, pp. 863 – 876.

  19. Nhan Nguyen, Khanh Trinh, Kevin Reynolds et al. Elastically Shaped Wing Optimization and Aircraft Concept for Improved Cruise Efficiency, NASA Report, 2010, available at:

  20. Boeing 787, available at:

Download — informational site MAI

Copyright © 2000-2024 by MAI