Methodology for substantiating additional requirements for the training of electronic warfare specialists
DOI: 10.34759/trd-2021-120-17
Аuthors
Air force academy named after professor N.E. Zhukovskii and Y.A. Gagarin, Voronezh, Russia
e-mail: dearaist@mail.ru
Abstract
The article substantiates the expediency of improving the quality of training of specialists in the field of electronic warfare. A methodology has been developed to substantiate additional requirements for the training of electronic warfare specialists. The use of mathematical methods and models in the processing of expert information is substantiated in the interests of ranking the requirements for the training of specialists. Additional requirements for the training of specialists in electronic warfare have been formulated. It is shown that the most important requirements for specialists in electronic warfare are the ability to make decisions, organize and implement the use of forces and means of electronic warfare units against aerospace control systems. According to the results of the study, using the Rush model for evaluating latent variables and a model that takes into account the competence of experts, it was found that the most important requirements for the training of electronic warfare specialists to perform the tasks of disorganizing the control of airmobile robotic systems of foreign armies are such as: be able to make decisions on the use of forces and technical means of electronic warfare units, organize and implement the use of forces and technical means of electronic warfare units; be able to make a decision on the use of forces and technical means of electronic warfare units, organize their use of electronic warfare units and control them in the course of fulfilling the tasks of electronic reconnaissance and suppression in conditions of radio-electronic interference created by modern electronic means of leading foreign countries; know the features of the use of modern domestic samples of electronic warfare technology.
Keywords:
training of specialists, electronic warfare, airborne robotic system, unmanned aerial vehicle, expert assessment, Rush's modelReferences
Novak K.V., Oleshko V.S., Starikova I.O., Toforov M.S. Trudy MAI, 2017, no. 94. URL: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=80936.
Stefanov V.A., Zaitsev A.V., Titkov O.S., Chabanov V.A., Vvedenskaya I.G. Bespilotnye LA kak vid aviatsionnoi tekhniki v borrsquo;be SShA za voennoe prevoskhodstvo. Chastrsquo; I (Unmanned aircraft as a type of aviation technology in the US struggle for military superiority. Part I), Moscow, NITs GosNIIAS, 2019, pp. 146ndash;183.
Panov A. Zarubezhnoe voennoe obozrenie, 2021, no. 6, pp. 52ndash;60. URL: https://zvo.ric.mil.ru/upload/site230/J7T2zjfWug.pdf
Ermakov A. Novyi oboronnyi zakaz. Strategii, 2020, no. 3, pp. 46ndash;48. URL: https://dfnc.ru/arhiv-zhurnalov/2020-3-62/aviatsiya-dlya-distantsionnoj-raboty/
Shashok L. Arsenal Otechestva, 2020, no. 6 (50), pp. 52ndash;59. URL: https://arsenal-otechestva.ru/archive/1412-6-2020
Golubev S.V., Zhirnov M.V. Vestnik voennogo obrazovaniya, 2020, no. 2(20), pp. 38-42.
Orlov A.I. Ekspertnye otsenki (Expert assessments), Moscow, IVSTE, 2002, 31 p.
Beshelev S.D., Gurvich F.G. Ekspertnye otsenki (Expert assessments), Moscow, Nauka, 2003. 79 p.
Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Copenhagen, Denmark, Danish Institute for Educational Research, 1960, 160 p.
Maslak A.A., Moiseev S.I. Modelrsquo; Rasha otsenki latentnykh peremennykh i ee svoistva: monografiya (Rushrsquo;s model for estimating latent variables and its properties: monograph), Voronezh, NPTs laquo;Nauchnaya knigaraquo;, 2016, 177 p.
Kuzrsquo;min V.B., Orlov A.I. Statisticheskie metody analiza ekspertnykh otsenok (Statistical methods for the analysis of expert assessments), Moscow, Nauka, 2007, pp. 220ndash;227.
Maslak A.A., Moiseev S.I., Osipov S.A. Problemy upravleniya, 2015, no. 5, pp. 58ndash;66.
Moiseev S.I. Ekonomika i menedzhment sistem upravleniya, 2015, no. 2.1 (16), pp. 166ndash;172.
Barkalov S.A., Moiseev S.I., Solovrsquo;eva E.V. Nauchnyi vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitelrsquo;nogo universiteta. Seriya: Upravlenie stroitelrsquo;stvom, 2014, no. 1 (6), pp. 98ndash;100.
Barkalov S.A., Moiseev S.I., Nasonova T.V. Upravlenie stroitelrsquo;stvom, 2018, no. 2 (11), pp. 6ndash;35.
Barkalov S.A., Moiseev S.I., Ushakov A.N. Proektnoe upravlenie v stroitelrsquo;stve, 2020, no. 4 (21), pp. 95ndash;112.
Lloid E., Lederman U. Spravochnik po prikladnoi statistike (Nandbook of applicable statistics), Moscow, Finansy i statistika, 1990, 526 p.
Antonov D.A., Zharkov M.V., Kuznetsov I.M., Lunev E.M., Pronrsquo;kin A.N. Trudy MAI, 2016, no. 91. URL: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=75632
Ananenkov A.E., Marin D.V., Nuzhdin V.M., Rastorguev V.V., Sokolov P.V. Trudy MAI, 2016, no. 91. URL: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=75662
Borodin V.V., Petrakov A.M., Shevtsov V.A. Trudy MAI, 2015, no. 81. URL: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=57894
Download