Criteria set for efficiency evaluation of counteraction to unmanned aerial vehicles methods

System analysis, control and data processing


Аuthors

Podstrigaev A. S.1*, Slobodyan M. G.2**, Mozhaeva E. I.3***

1. Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, 5, str. Professora Popova, Saint Petersburg, 197376, Russia
2. Bryansk State Technical University, BSTU, 7, blvd. 50-let Oktyabrya, Bryansk, 241035, Russia
3. Research Institute “Vector”, 14a, Academic Pavlov str., Staint Petersburg, 197376, Russia

*e-mail: ap0d@ya.ru
**e-mail: slobmaria@yandex.ru
***e-mail: mozhaeva1702@gmail.com

Abstract

The presented work puts forward a technique for qualitative comparison of technical means for counteracting the growing unlawful application of unmanned flying vehicles (UAV). This technique is based on a set of criteria for the effectiveness evaluation of UAVs counteraction techniques developed by the authors.

The article itemizes the most widespread technical methods for the UAV counteraction. It states the main disadvantages of the conventional approaches to these methods evaluation, such as evaluation incompleteness, poor analysis of application conditions, and in many cases the lack of quantitative indicators.

reveals the most commonly used techniques of counteraction methods and the basic disadvantages of approaches to efficiency evaluation of these counteraction methods. They are an incomplete evaluation, weak analysis of practical implementation conditions and, in most cases, quantification deficiency. It is demonstrated, that physical principles difference of counteraction methods realization causes a problem of their direct comparison. Thus, the goal of the presented work consists in developing the system of criteria for qualitative evaluation of the UAV counteraction methods devoid of the said disadvantages.

The presented set of criteria allows performing a comparative evaluation of various UAV counteraction methods with regard for their characteristics of detection and counteraction, the UAV recognition quality, hardware volume, versatility and consequences of its implementation, electromagnetic compatibility, economic indicators etc. The proposed system envisages criteria splitting into sub-criteria, as well as partitioning the latter into their own sub-criteria and further by analogy if necessary. The final quantitative evaluation is computed by the special equation employing the obtained evaluating coefficients depending on the introduced weight coefficients of each criterion and sub-criterion.

The developed set of criteria allows quantifying various implementations of the existing UAVs counteraction methods; compare various implementations of one or several methods of UAVs counteraction; educe more effective counteraction methods for specific application conditions; forecast the efficiency of prospective counteraction methods.

Keywords:

unmanned aerial vehicles, protection from unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles counteraction, efficiency evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicles counteraction

References

  1. Podstrigaev A.S., Sidortsov I.A. XXXV Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya “Molodoi issledovatel': vyzovy i perspektivy”: sbornik trudov (Moscow, 12-22 Yune 2017), Moscow, Internauka, 2017, vol. 10 (35), pp. 367 – 374.

  2. Smirnov A.V. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii ad"yunktov, aspirantov, kursantov i studentov “Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya ugolovno-ispolnitel'noi sistemy Rossii na sovremennom etape” (Samara, 25 April 2017), Samara, Samarskii yuridicheskii institut FSIN Rossii, pp. 144 - 147.

  3. Ryan J. Wallace, Jon M. Loffi. Examining Unmanned Aerial System Threats & Defenses: A Conceptual Analysis, International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 2015, vol. 2, issue 4. DOI: 10.15394/ijaaa.2015.1084.

  4. Bykov A.I. Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie, 2018, no. 2 (42), pp. 66 - 70.

  5. Ananenkov A.E., Marin D.V., Nuzhdin V.M., Rastorguev V.V., Sokolov P.V. Trudy MAI, 2016, no. 91, available at: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=75662

  6. Loseva S.N. Sbornik materialov vystavki sredstv obespecheniya bezopasnosti gosudarstva «Interpolitekh – 2017, Izd-vo Moskovskii universitet Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiiskoi Federatsii im. V.Ya. Kikotya, 2017, pp. 108 - 109.

  7. Slobodyan M.G., Mozhaeva E.I., Podstrigaev A.S. Sovremennye problemy radioelektroniki: sbornik nauchnykh trudov, Krasnoyarsk, Sibirskii federal'nyi universitet, 2018, pp. 46 - 50.

  8. Semenets V.O., Trukhin M.P. Naukoemkie tekhnologii v kosmicheskikh issledovaniyakh Zemli, 2018, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 4 - 12.

  9. Teodorovich N.N., Stroganova S.M., Abramov P.S. Internet-zhurnal “Naukovedenie”. 2017, vol. 9, no. 1, available at: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/13TVN117.pdf

  10. Cang Liang, Ning Cao, Xiaokai Lu, Youjie Ye. UAV Detection Using Continuous Wave Radar, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Communication and Signal Processing (ICICSP), 28-30 Sept. 2018, Singapore. DOI:10.1109/ICICSP.2018.8549736

  11. Sineglazov V.M. Complex structure of UAVs detection and identification, Electronics and Control Systems, 2015, no. 3 (45), pp. 28 - 32.

  12. Igor Korobiichuk, Yuriy Danik, Oleksyj Samchyshyn The estimation algorithm of operative capabilities of complex countermeasures to resist UAVs, Simulation: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation Innternational, 7 August 2018, vol. 95, pp. 569 – 573. DOI:10.1177/0037549718791264.

  13. Ergunov V.O., Il'in V.O., Nekrasov M.I., Sosunov V.G. Voprosy oboronnoi tekhniki. Seriya 16: Tekhnicheskie sredstva protivodeistviya terrorizmu, 2018, no. 1-2 (115-116), pp. 51 - 58.

  14. Todd Numphreys. Statement on the security threat posed by unmanned aerial systems and possible countermeasures, Radionavigation Laboratory, The University of Texas at Austin, 2015, URL: https://radionavlab.ae.utexas.edu/images/stories/files/papers/statement-humphreys-20150318.pdf

  15. Teodorovich N.N., Stroganova S.M., Abramov P.S. Internet-zhurnal «Naukovedenie», 2017, vol. 9, no. 1, available at: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/13TVN117.pdf

  16. Dinesh Sathyamoorthy. A review of security threats of unmanned aerial vehicles and mitigation steps, ResearchGate, 2015, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282443666_A_Review_of_Security_Threats_of_Unmanned_Aerial_V...

  17. Kuznetsov V.E., Volkov Yu.A. Voprosy radioelektroniki, 2016, no. 12, pp. 81 - 87.

  18. Korchenko A.G., Il'yash O.S. Zbіrnik naukovikh prats' Kharkіvs'kogo natsіonal'nogo unіversitetu Povіtryanikh Sil, 2012, no. 4(33), pp. 27 - 36.

  19. Karimov A.Kh. Trudy MAI, 2011, no. 47, available at: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=26767

  20. Nickolay L. Georgiev, Venstislav I. Pehlivanski, Ognyan G. Todorov. Indicators on the Effectiveness of Radio-Electronic Counteraction against Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, NDT Days, 2018, vol. 1, issue.1, pp. 126 - 131.


Download

mai.ru — informational site MAI

Copyright © 2000-2021 by MAI

Вход